Review



simrt version 7.2  (Vision RT Ltd)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Vision RT Ltd simrt version 7.2
    Table sag response to varying loads ranging from a non‐weighted scenario up to an additional weight of 130 kg for different surrogate systems: <t>(a)</t> <t>RGSC,</t> (b) <t>SimRT,</t> and (c) Polaris.
    Simrt Version 7.2, supplied by Vision RT Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/simrt version 7.2/product/Vision RT Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    simrt version 7.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate‐driven respiratory‐guided computed tomography"

    Article Title: Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate‐driven respiratory‐guided computed tomography

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14565

    Table sag response to varying loads ranging from a non‐weighted scenario up to an additional weight of 130 kg for different surrogate systems: (a) RGSC, (b) SimRT, and (c) Polaris.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Table sag response to varying loads ranging from a non‐weighted scenario up to an additional weight of 130 kg for different surrogate systems: (a) RGSC, (b) SimRT, and (c) Polaris.

    Techniques Used:

    Table sag for different optical surrogate systems in dependency of weight and longitudinal table sag profile in dependency of position and weight.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Table sag for different optical surrogate systems in dependency of weight and longitudinal table sag profile in dependency of position and weight.

    Techniques Used:

    Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a 4DCT acquisition. (a) RGSC breathing signal, (b) SimRT breathing signal, (c) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (d) Polaris breathing signal in green, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow for the 4DCT acquisition.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a 4DCT acquisition. (a) RGSC breathing signal, (b) SimRT breathing signal, (c) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (d) Polaris breathing signal in green, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow for the 4DCT acquisition.

    Techniques Used:

    Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a DIBH acquisition. (a) SimRT breathing signal, (b) RGSC breathing signal, (c) Polaris breathing signal in orange, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow, (d) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (e) top and middle images show the threshold set in SimRT (white on the left graph and in blue on the RTC) for the non‐weighted situation and the bottom image shows weight being added between breath‐holds and its impact on the RTC. The yellow star indicates the breathing state, which the RTC displays.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a DIBH acquisition. (a) SimRT breathing signal, (b) RGSC breathing signal, (c) Polaris breathing signal in orange, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow, (d) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (e) top and middle images show the threshold set in SimRT (white on the left graph and in blue on the RTC) for the non‐weighted situation and the bottom image shows weight being added between breath‐holds and its impact on the RTC. The yellow star indicates the breathing state, which the RTC displays.

    Techniques Used:

    Illustration of a typical patient's (83 years, 76.8 kg) curve obtained by the two camera systems RGSC and SimRT in a breathing‐adapted axial 4DCT scan.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Illustration of a typical patient's (83 years, 76.8 kg) curve obtained by the two camera systems RGSC and SimRT in a breathing‐adapted axial 4DCT scan.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    simrt version 7.2  (Vision RT Ltd)
    90
    Vision RT Ltd simrt version 7.2
    Table sag response to varying loads ranging from a non‐weighted scenario up to an additional weight of 130 kg for different surrogate systems: <t>(a)</t> <t>RGSC,</t> (b) <t>SimRT,</t> and (c) Polaris.
    Simrt Version 7.2, supplied by Vision RT Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/simrt version 7.2/product/Vision RT Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    simrt version 7.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Table sag response to varying loads ranging from a non‐weighted scenario up to an additional weight of 130 kg for different surrogate systems: (a) RGSC, (b) SimRT, and (c) Polaris.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate‐driven respiratory‐guided computed tomography

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14565

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Table sag response to varying loads ranging from a non‐weighted scenario up to an additional weight of 130 kg for different surrogate systems: (a) RGSC, (b) SimRT, and (c) Polaris.

    Article Snippet: We evaluated three surrogate systems: Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC; version 1.1.25.0, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, California, USA), SimRT (version 7.2, VisionRT, London, UK), and a Polaris Spectra (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada).

    Techniques:

    Table sag for different optical surrogate systems in dependency of weight and longitudinal table sag profile in dependency of position and weight.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate‐driven respiratory‐guided computed tomography

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14565

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Table sag for different optical surrogate systems in dependency of weight and longitudinal table sag profile in dependency of position and weight.

    Article Snippet: We evaluated three surrogate systems: Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC; version 1.1.25.0, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, California, USA), SimRT (version 7.2, VisionRT, London, UK), and a Polaris Spectra (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada).

    Techniques:

    Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a 4DCT acquisition. (a) RGSC breathing signal, (b) SimRT breathing signal, (c) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (d) Polaris breathing signal in green, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow for the 4DCT acquisition.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate‐driven respiratory‐guided computed tomography

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14565

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a 4DCT acquisition. (a) RGSC breathing signal, (b) SimRT breathing signal, (c) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (d) Polaris breathing signal in green, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow for the 4DCT acquisition.

    Article Snippet: We evaluated three surrogate systems: Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC; version 1.1.25.0, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, California, USA), SimRT (version 7.2, VisionRT, London, UK), and a Polaris Spectra (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada).

    Techniques:

    Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a DIBH acquisition. (a) SimRT breathing signal, (b) RGSC breathing signal, (c) Polaris breathing signal in orange, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow, (d) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (e) top and middle images show the threshold set in SimRT (white on the left graph and in blue on the RTC) for the non‐weighted situation and the bottom image shows weight being added between breath‐holds and its impact on the RTC. The yellow star indicates the breathing state, which the RTC displays.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate‐driven respiratory‐guided computed tomography

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14565

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Response of the different surrogate systems for the weighted and the situation with no weight in a DIBH acquisition. (a) SimRT breathing signal, (b) RGSC breathing signal, (c) Polaris breathing signal in orange, Polaris table signal in blue, Polaris table movement corrected signal in yellow, (d) Polaris table signal tracking the 3D printed tool, (e) top and middle images show the threshold set in SimRT (white on the left graph and in blue on the RTC) for the non‐weighted situation and the bottom image shows weight being added between breath‐holds and its impact on the RTC. The yellow star indicates the breathing state, which the RTC displays.

    Article Snippet: We evaluated three surrogate systems: Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC; version 1.1.25.0, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, California, USA), SimRT (version 7.2, VisionRT, London, UK), and a Polaris Spectra (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada).

    Techniques:

    Illustration of a typical patient's (83 years, 76.8 kg) curve obtained by the two camera systems RGSC and SimRT in a breathing‐adapted axial 4DCT scan.

    Journal: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

    Article Title: Investigating the effects of table movement and sag on optical surrogate‐driven respiratory‐guided computed tomography

    doi: 10.1002/acm2.14565

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Illustration of a typical patient's (83 years, 76.8 kg) curve obtained by the two camera systems RGSC and SimRT in a breathing‐adapted axial 4DCT scan.

    Article Snippet: We evaluated three surrogate systems: Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC; version 1.1.25.0, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, California, USA), SimRT (version 7.2, VisionRT, London, UK), and a Polaris Spectra (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada).

    Techniques: